|
The 40th anniversary of Woodstock, which took place from August 15 to August 18, 1969 is being marked forty years and eight days later by the release of Ang Lee's Taking Woodstock. Reviews are not quite groovy. I concur with the downbeat analysis. Here's what the major critics had to say:
In fact, Lou Lumenick in the New York Post complains that Lee "turns
the fabled music festival, a key cultural moment of the late 20th
century, into an exceedingly lame, heavily clichéd, thumb-sucking
bore." Likewise Rafer Guzmán in the New York Daily News calls the movie
"frustratingly sedate, more opiate than hallucinogen." Taking note of
Lee's assertion at the Cannes Film Festival last May that "I wanted to
make a comedy after making so many tragedies," Claudia Puig in USA
Today comments, "He has done that, but he also has made a surprisingly
bland film." She concludes: "Lee's movie captures the mellow mood and
mud-caked faces of the crowd but misses the reverberations of the
counterculture revolution."
But Stephen Holden, who calls the movie
"likable, humane," suggests that such a task was never the object of
the filmmaker. "Taking Woodstock," he writes, "is a gentle, meandering
celebration of personal liberation at a moment when rigid social
barriers were becoming more permeable, at least among the young."
Several reviewers also find much to praise about the movie even while
giving it barely passing grades. Betsy Sharkey comments in the Los
Angeles Times that the movie amounts to "a meticulously rendered and
achingly authentic portrait of a time and a place that is, by turns,
sweeping and intimate, poignant and painful, funny and flat, emotional
and emotionless. It's a frustrating complication of a movie with a
sprawling story and grand ambitions -- and some truly grand acting --
that stumbles almost as often as it soars. Bummer."
I agree. Take away the residual nostalgia factor and the story just doesn't stand on it's own. The main character simply meanders through his coming of age choices. His choices cost him very little so his actions (or actually reactions) are robbed of meaning.
Trackback(0)
 |
TrackBack URI for this entry
